It has been suggested here on the floor that there are no provisions for health care or welfare reform in the budget being presented here by the majority. There are no provisions in the alternative before us either. In both versions they are included through reserve clauses. That is how we deal with these matters in a budget resolution. We simply create a reserve clause for health care or welfare reform or whatever. That allows the committee of competent jurisdiction, or of appropriate jurisdiction, to take up that particular subject and to produce a deficit-neutral provision with regard to that particular item. For example, in the case of health care, because of the reserve clause in this bill, should the Finance Committee choose to produce a health care reform bill, they are free to do it under this budget on either side, as long as it is budget neutral. So the two are similar in that particular way.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing budget provisions for health care and welfare reform during a floor debate.
Share
More from James Sasser
I rise this afternoon to support the amendment offered by the distinguished Senator from Iowa. With this amendment, Senator Harkin, I believe, wisely directs resources toward the chronically underfunded domestic programs and away from a…
As I understand the way this tax credit works, or child-care credit works, if a family is making $1 million a year they would get the same tax credit per child as a family making $30,000 a year. Is that correct?
But in the event his wins, then the Senator will modify his amendment and the modification will be in such a way that you still fund the Byrne provision but you will take the funds from where at that juncture?
I have just a couple of comments. Again, with regard to the whole question here of forming a commission to recommend savings to Congress, one of the problems we have in Government now is that we have too many commissions. The cost of these…





