I rise this afternoon to support the amendment offered by the distinguished Senator from Iowa. With this amendment, Senator Harkin, I believe, wisely directs resources toward the chronically underfunded domestic programs and away from a single, consistently overfunded military program. What the Harkin amendment seeks to do, as he has explained, is increase funding for Federal grants to State and local governments for community policing and drug patrols, while reducing the planned funding increases for the ballistic missile defense programs. But Senator Harkin's amendment, unlike many of those we consider in this body, offers specific program cuts to pay for his proposed increases. I commend the Senator for taking that approach. It is always very easy to come up with a nonspecific spending reduction to pay for an add-on, but the Senator is taking the responsible approach, I think, in stating specifically what he would reduce to pay for the amendment that he is offering, therefore, making his amendment deficit neutral.
Editor's note · Context
Supporting an amendment to redirect funding from military programs to domestic initiatives.
Share
More from James Sasser
I rise today in support of S. 1560, which would make the Social Security Administration an independent agency. I believe this legislation elevates this important Federal agency to its proper status and acknowledges the importance of the…
I rise today to recognize Robert F. Hale, who, after 17 years of commendable service at the Congressional Budget Office, has recently been nominated and confirmed by the Senate for the position of Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for…
A working family of four making $16,000 a year would get no credit under this plan. Is that not correct?
I commend the distinguished Senator from New Jersey for offering this very worthwhile amendment. We held hearings in the Senate Budget Committee last year on the whole question of tax expenditures and how very costly many of these tax…





