I share the distinguished chairman of the Agriculture Committee's enthusiasm for the WIC Program. I would point out that the budget resolution as reported by the Budget Committee included $3.6 billion for this program, an 11 percent increase over last year's levels. This level of funding would keep this program on track for full funding in fiscal year 1996. Senator Boxer's amendment that we adopted yesterday added $100 million, bringing the total level of funding to $3.7 billion or 14 percent over last year's level. WIC, which has now been in existence for 20 years, is certainly one of the most successful of all Federal programs. Providing nutritious food and vital services to at-risk low-income women and children invests not only in their future, but also reduces the potential for costly health problems. I commend my colleague from Vermont for his strong leadership on the WIC Program and child nutrition in general.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing funding for the WIC Program during a budget resolution debate.
Share
More from James Sasser
That is a quick overview of the tax changes. Let us see what is happening on the spending side. I am sorry to say, the picture gets worse. It deteriorates even more. The fact is, this plan pays for its tax breaks by taking away health care…
As I understand the way this tax credit works, or child-care credit works, if a family is making $1 million a year they would get the same tax credit per child as a family making $30,000 a year. Is that correct?
But in the event his wins, then the Senator will modify his amendment and the modification will be in such a way that you still fund the Byrne provision but you will take the funds from where at that juncture?
I rise today to recognize Robert F. Hale, who, after 17 years of commendable service at the Congressional Budget Office, has recently been nominated and confirmed by the Senate for the position of Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for…





