I share the distinguished chairman of the Agriculture Committee's enthusiasm for the WIC Program. I would point out that the budget resolution as reported by the Budget Committee included $3.6 billion for this program, an 11 percent increase over last year's levels. This level of funding would keep this program on track for full funding in fiscal year 1996. Senator Boxer's amendment that we adopted yesterday added $100 million, bringing the total level of funding to $3.7 billion or 14 percent over last year's level. WIC, which has now been in existence for 20 years, is certainly one of the most successful of all Federal programs. Providing nutritious food and vital services to at-risk low-income women and children invests not only in their future, but also reduces the potential for costly health problems. I commend my colleague from Vermont for his strong leadership on the WIC Program and child nutrition in general.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing funding for the WIC Program during a budget resolution debate.
Share
More from James Sasser
First off, I say to my friend from Georgia, this amendment is silent on the question of 1995. It does not protect 1995 at all. It does not even attempt to protect 1995 at all. So defense would be subject, in 1995, to taking those chances…
You have a paranoid, isolated, dangerous state now on the verge of possessing nuclear weapons.
But in the event his wins, then the Senator will modify his amendment and the modification will be in such a way that you still fund the Byrne provision but you will take the funds from where at that juncture?
Mr. President, to sum up, in essence what this Republican alternative does to the majority budget, it simply cuts taxes, reduces revenues, and the principal tax cuts are the time-honored capital gains tax cut which we know from past…





