First off, I say to my friend from Georgia, this amendment is silent on the question of 1995. It does not protect 1995 at all. It does not even attempt to protect 1995 at all. So defense would be subject, in 1995, to taking those chances with everything else.
Discussing the implications of an amendment related to defense funding for the year 1995.
Share
More from James Sasser
You have a paranoid, isolated, dangerous state now on the verge of possessing nuclear weapons.
Yes indeed, Madam President. That would be my view also. The ``relation back'' provision merely relates to determining when a security interest in a motor vehicle is perfected in accordance with State law. Clarifying that ``relation back''…
It is my understanding, that every appellate circuit that has examined this issue has held that State laws that allow the timing of perfection to ``relate back'' to an earlier date are consistent with and not in conflict with Federal…
If they are paying no taxes and this gives them no tax credit, they would get no benefit under this proposal.
Other voices in this conversation
