First off, I say to my friend from Georgia, this amendment is silent on the question of 1995. It does not protect 1995 at all. It does not even attempt to protect 1995 at all. So defense would be subject, in 1995, to taking those chances with everything else.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of an amendment related to defense funding for the year 1995.
Share
More from James Sasser
the Senator from Texas, in the amendment that he offered here this afternoon, beginning at about 2:30 in the afternoon, seeks to eliminate every one of the President's initiatives, every single one of them, and he adds an $87 billion cut…
I will tell you what the reality would be of the vision that he is trying to foist onto the United States Senate today and onto the American people. The vision would create larger deficits in the outyears. The deficits would continue to…
Mr. President, to sum up, in essence what this Republican alternative does to the majority budget, it simply cuts taxes, reduces revenues, and the principal tax cuts are the time-honored capital gains tax cut which we know from past…
I think we have become all too accustomed, in the debates dealing with the budget in recent years, to hearing claims that are exaggerated, partial statements of the facts, and on occasion outright misstatements of facts. Yesterday's…





