It is my understanding, that every appellate circuit that has examined this issue has held that State laws that allow the timing of perfection to ``relate back'' to an earlier date are consistent with and not in conflict with Federal bankruptcy law in general, and section 547 in particular. I would note for the chairman In Re Basenlehner, 918 F.2nd 928 (11th Cir. 1990); In Re Hesser, 984 F.2nd 345 (10th Cir. 1993). The eleventh circuit came to a similar conclusion in the case of In Re Howard, 920 F.2nd 887 (11th Cir. 1991). I would say to the chairman that my purpose in this discussion is to establish that, although there is no statutory language to codify these court cases, they are consistent with Federal bankruptcy law.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the consistency of state laws with federal bankruptcy law.
Share
More from James Sasser
Mr. President, to sum up, in essence what this Republican alternative does to the majority budget, it simply cuts taxes, reduces revenues, and the principal tax cuts are the time-honored capital gains tax cut which we know from past…
But it would not be effective really in safeguarding the discretionary spending from being raided.
I share the distinguished chairman of the Agriculture Committee's enthusiasm for the WIC Program. I would point out that the budget resolution as reported by the Budget Committee included $3.6 billion for this program, an 11 percent…
The alleged protection that the Senator from Mississippi seeks to impose for defense spending here applies only to the incremental cut, the Grassley-Exon cut, and that is all. I know this is somewhat confusing, but as I read this…





