It is my understanding, that every appellate circuit that has examined this issue has held that State laws that allow the timing of perfection to ``relate back'' to an earlier date are consistent with and not in conflict with Federal bankruptcy law in general, and section 547 in particular. I would note for the chairman In Re Basenlehner, 918 F.2nd 928 (11th Cir. 1990); In Re Hesser, 984 F.2nd 345 (10th Cir. 1993). The eleventh circuit came to a similar conclusion in the case of In Re Howard, 920 F.2nd 887 (11th Cir. 1991). I would say to the chairman that my purpose in this discussion is to establish that, although there is no statutory language to codify these court cases, they are consistent with Federal bankruptcy law.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the consistency of state laws with federal bankruptcy law.
Share
More from James Sasser
A working family of four making $16,000 a year would get no credit under this plan. Is that not correct?
I think we have become all too accustomed, in the debates dealing with the budget in recent years, to hearing claims that are exaggerated, partial statements of the facts, and on occasion outright misstatements of facts. Yesterday's…
let us just consider this $500 child credit here. Our colleagues have characterized this proposal as a middle-class tax cut. The truth is, nothing could be further from the truth. Let us just consider how this credit works. For families…
Is the Senator from Indiana trying to represent that this is a refundable tax credit to people who make under $16,000 a year?





