More than 70 percent of all Social Security beneficiaries have annual incomes of $30,000 or less. Asking these people--the retired elderly, 70 percent of whom make $30,000 or less--to give up some of their benefits could create very real hardships. Even middle-income seniors rely heavily on Social Security as their primary source of retirement income. More than half of all the people over age 65 rely on Social Security for at least half of their income, and nearly one-quarter of them rely on Social Security for 90 percent or more of their income. Without that income from Social Security, many would have a very difficult time meeting their expenses indeed. Third, the reason I would oppose means testing for Social Security is the benefit structure is very strongly progressive so that lower income beneficiaries receive a significantly higher percentage over their earned income back in benefits. The program provides much greater returns to those who are at the lower end of the economic ladder. Also, as of 1984, the benefits to wealthier recipients are subject to a Federal income tax. Just last year the portion of benefits that is taxed increased from 50 percent to 85 percent, and this has had the effect of reducing the benefits for wealthier beneficiaries. One in five beneficiaries currently pays taxes on benefits.
Editor's note · Context
The speaker addresses the impact of Social Security benefits on low-income seniors and opposes means testing.
Share
More from James Sasser
The alleged protection that the Senator from Mississippi seeks to impose for defense spending here applies only to the incremental cut, the Grassley-Exon cut, and that is all. I know this is somewhat confusing, but as I read this…
Now, I say to my colleagues, we are spending in fiscal year 1995 at below discretionary levels, fiscal year 1994. And what I was pointing out there in that debate in the Budget Committee is that we are spending less in discretionary…
First off, I say to my friend from Georgia, this amendment is silent on the question of 1995. It does not protect 1995 at all. It does not even attempt to protect 1995 at all. So defense would be subject, in 1995, to taking those chances…
let us just consider this $500 child credit here. Our colleagues have characterized this proposal as a middle-class tax cut. The truth is, nothing could be further from the truth. Let us just consider how this credit works. For families…





