Yeah, but you seem very wishy-washy on this, just for what it is worth, as you have been in multiple settings and it is very off-putting.

section 36(b) of the Arms Export Control Act requires that Congress receive prior notification of certain proposed arms sales as defined by that statute. Upon such notification, the Congress has 30 calendar days during which the sale may…

Well, that is a fact, and nothing has happened.

But it is strange policy, is it not, that we have foreign banks that we are clearing to use their dollar reserves to do business with Iran and not our own?

Except that none of them would be involved in it. It is not very powerful, but keep going.

But they would not participate in that. But keep going. We know they are not going to participate in that, and that is a ridiculous thought to think that if they do not agree with it, they are going to go ahead and put sanctions in place.

It would seem as if you all have not precluded that, and you all would not stand in the way of us doing that if we felt it was an important thing to do.

So we could do that, too. If we wanted to put additional sanctions in place that were not the nuclear-related sanctions, on human rights, on terrorism, and on ballistic testing, you would be OK with that?

But you would not object to it because you realize there has to be a regime to snap back to, and so you would support us doing our job and extending it, would you not?

Mr. Szubin, at the end of the day, Iran wants access to U.S. dollars most. Is that correct?

As the world's two largest democracies, it is essential that Washington and Delhi stand together to uphold democratic values, principles, and norms in the Indo-Pacific.

for the Committee on Foreign Relations I report favorably the following nomination list which was printed in the Record on the date indicated, and ask unanimous consent, to save the expense of reprinting on the Executive Calendar that this…