Surely the statute ought not to run in favor of any man while he retains all the evidences of his crime in his own possession, and least of all in favor of a public officer who continues to defraud the Treasury and conceal the transaction for the brief term of two years.
Editor's note · Context
Jackson argues against the statute of limitations favoring those who conceal their crimes, especially public officials.
Share
More from Andrew Jackson
In compliance with a resolution of the Senate at their last session, I herewith transmit the inclosed documents, which contain all the information on the subject of the claim of the heirs of George Galphin within the power of the Executive.
I herewith transmit to the Senate a report of the Postmaster-General, on the subject of the claims of Messrs. Stockton and Stokes, with a review of that report by the Solicitor of the Treasury, to whom, under a law of the last session of…
no further delay in the acknowledgment, if not in the redress, of the injuries complained of
I herewith transmit the report ** of the Secretary of the Navy, which affords all the information required by said resolution.





