I do not know why that language would have to be offered on this legislation. It is not germane to the Justice-State-Commerce bill. It is not germane to the CR. We are willing to try to accommodate the Senator if we can have some time to look at the language and find out whether this is in keeping with past precedent. We want to be sure that we are not cutting new ground here. And I think perhaps over a period of time we might be able to resolve this matter. We cannot do it now. There is no way we can agree to any time agreement until many of us have had a chance to look at it. So it will probably be some time prior to the time we can give any assurance to the Senator from New Hampshire. But we will certainly look at it and see if there is a way to do it in spite of the fact we do not think it belongs on this piece of legislation.
Thomas Daschle: “I do not know why that language would have to be offered on this legislation. It is not germane to the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing concerns about language in legislation during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from Thomas Daschle
The American people, by survey after survey, say they want these tax loopholes closed when they are informed particularly of the loopholes which allow corporations to shift revenue to a tax haven.
One is defining our issues as clearly as we can. And before we can ever get to the solutions of healthcare, we have to make sure that we are all on the same page with regard to the problems of healthcare.
I commend President-elect Obama for selecting such an extraordinary nominee to lead the Nation's healthcare agenda.
I want to re-instate a science-driven environment. I want to take ideology and politics as much as humanly possible out of the process.





