for the last 2 days we have discussed the merits and shortcomings of the Public Rangelands Management Act. It is apparent that this is a complicated debate, riddled with hyperbole and misunderstanding. Let no one misunderstand, however, the context within which this debate has been conducted. There exists today throughout the West a palpable sense of economic anxiety that has its roots in the issuance of new grazing regulations by the Department of the Interior 2 rac{1}{2} years ago; regulations that fueled fear among ranchers that they face a campaign by the Government to permanently remove them from Federal lands. This apprehension about Government insensitivity to the economic realities of ranching is tangible in my State of South Dakota and widespread throughout the West. Moreover, it has been aggravated by a prolonged period of extremely low cattle prices coupled with record high feed costs. There is no doubt in my mind, Mr. President, that ranchers' frustration with current Federal grazing policy is justified. Their grievances are both procedural and substantive. It was apparent that the regulations issued by the Interior Department in 1993 were conceived and issued in a manner that discounted the views of ranchers who earn their livelihood from public land.
Thomas Daschle: “for the last 2 days we have discussed the merits and shortcomings of the Public Rangelands Management Act. It is…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the economic impact of grazing regulations on ranchers during a Senate debate.
Share
More from Thomas Daschle
It will use Social Security and Medicare surpluses. It will create the same deficit situation, I promise you, as we have seen all through the 1980s and early `90s.
It seems to me to make a lot of sense that there should be a Federal health board that has some oversight responsibility.
One is defining our issues as clearly as we can. And before we can ever get to the solutions of healthcare, we have to make sure that we are all on the same page with regard to the problems of healthcare.
The sustainable growth rate is an outdated system that basically incentivizes people using patient utilization rather than looking at healthy outcomes for reimbursement.





