That is exactly what we would be suggesting with the first amendment the caucus will propose. The distinguished Senator has characterized it exactly right. Why not give seniors a little more choice? But with that choice, perhaps a little more certainty that regardless of what may happen in the private sector they will always have the Medicare plan available as a choice. That is all we are asking. If Medicare cannot compete effectively, no one will use it and everyone will go to the private sector. If it can compete, if it can provide a comparable benefit, why not have it, instead of going through this backup business every year. That will be a key priority amendment for us when we have the debate.
Thomas Daschle: “That is exactly what we would be suggesting with the first amendment the caucus will propose. The distinguished Senator…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing proposed amendments to enhance Medicare choices for seniors.
Share
More from Thomas Daschle
Confirming the President's nominees is one of the most important Constitutional duties of the Senate.
Well, Senator Coburn, I believe that a top-down review is essential. I would start with that. I think it is very, very important for us to understand what the problems are before we try to make the system better.
I commend President-elect Obama for selecting such an extraordinary nominee to lead the Nation's healthcare agenda.
As we look to ways with which to bring down costs, I am absolutely convinced that a big part of that effort... will be determined by the degree to which generic drugs are allowed to play the role that it can.





