I rise to recognize all the Senators who participated in this important and healthy debate. In particular, I thank Senator Leahy and Senator Byrd for their tireless defense of the Constitution. In addition, however, I also want to recognize Senator Feinstein for her commitment to victims of violence and for working to ensure that they are treated with fairness and decency and respect. While I strongly disagree with the approach the proponents of this amendment have taken, I completely agree with the sentiments they express. Victims should have a strong voice in our criminal justice system. Senator Feinstein has been committed to this cause for decades and I believe her passion has brought new focus to this important issue. Like many of us, I know what it is like when violence strikes your own family. I would not wish that pain on anyone. And I certainly do not want to see any victim's grief compounded by a needlessly callous or insensitive judicial system. The question we have been debating, however, is not whether victims should have a voice in the criminal justice process. The question before us is whether we must amend our nation's Constitution to achieve that goal.
Thomas Daschle: “I rise to recognize all the Senators who participated in this important and healthy debate. In particular, I thank…”
Editor's note · Context
Recognizing Senators for their contributions to a debate on victims' rights in the criminal justice system.
Share
More from Thomas Daschle
We have cost problems. We have access problems. But as you rightfully point out in your question, we certainly have quality problems.
Well, Senator Coburn, I believe that a top-down review is essential. I would start with that. I think it is very, very important for us to understand what the problems are before we try to make the system better.
As we look to ways with which to bring down costs, I am absolutely convinced that a big part of that effort... will be determined by the degree to which generic drugs are allowed to play the role that it can.
We try to work together, when possible, to write legislation that focuses on what we can agree on--not what divides us.





