John Thune

If we decide to develop that system, which of the three legs of the nuclear triad would be further reduced to accommodate prompt global strike?

Why didn't we get a statement in the treaty text on an issue of equal importance to us, such as at least some reference to the myriad of issues raised by Russia's massive numerical superiority in tactical nuclear weapons, which should be…

What beneficial geopolitical developments have taken place in the interim that compel reductions in the United States nuclear arsenal down to 700 deployed strategic nuclear delivery vehicles?

This $14 billion is not nearly sufficient to develop and acquire a next-generation bomber, a follow-on ICBM, a follow-on air-launched cruise missile, and a conventional prompt global strike capability.

The completion of the New START makes clear that we are committed to real reductions, and to upholding our end of the bargain under the NPT.

What is your estimate of how the Russians will configure their strategic forces under the New START?

Secretary Gates, please provide the analysis of alternative force structures that would comply with the New START central limits.

President Obama asserted in his NPR that the United States could deter potential adversaries and reassure allies with a 'reduced reliance on nuclear weapons.'

The press has reported that the administration is going to spend about $100 billion over the next 10 years in nuclear delivery systems.

I share a concern, too, with respect to the date next summer for withdrawal.

What happens when we leave?

I'm concerned that the notion that we're going to be pulling down here in the not too distant future does shape the relationships.

This is a very simple, straightforward question. That question is, Do we, the U.S. Senate, want to be on the record with regard to the issue of whether the EPA ought to move forward and try to regulate CO2 emissions under the Clean Air Act…

We're dealing with unprecedented levels of deficit spending and debt. And when you hear stories like this----it doesn't do anything to bolster the public's confidence in their government and its ability to make sure that they are being…

There's no question that we face a lot of challenges, going forward, when it comes to addressing the changing terrorist threats.

I hope that--it seems, to me at least, that, given the excess cost for the current contract award, and the flaws in the solicitation process, that TSA ought to take a--undertake a fresh, independent review of this procurement, and report…

Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

I think any additional regulation should be as focused as possible on fixing the problem at hand.

New regulations should not duplicate existing regulations, and auto manufacturers should have an appropriate amount of time to retool manufacturing lines and test new vehicle designs to comply with the new regulations.

Senator Udall has a bill that we actually think is a good approach.

And I do appreciate your holding today's hearing, and giving some examination to the legislation, and an opportunity for the stakeholders to all come and give us their views.

I think it is appropriate for Congress to respond with additional instruction for the auto industry that will protect consumers from this type of design flaw in the future.

We must also closely scrutinize the response of our Federal agencies.

As we speak, there are a few thousand, and potentially tens of thousands, of barrels of oil that are leaking into the Gulf of Mexico each day.

This leak will likely continue for the foreseeable future causing environmental and economic damage that will last for several years to come.