On the recordApril 28, 2010
William Perry said the treaty advances American security objectives, and James Schlesinger called ratification 'obligatory.'
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Perry views the treaty as beneficial for U.S. security.
Share
More from William J. Perry
Aug 2, 2010
The United States has global interests, and those global interests require presence around the world...
Apr 28, 2010
The treaty is a valuable confidence-building measure in that it provides for a vitally important continuing dialogue between the United States and Russia on strategic nuclear weapons.
Aug 2, 2010
I do not. I have studied the treaty rather carefully, and it is my own judgment that it provides adequately for the national security interests of the United States.
Aug 2, 2010
I just wanted to make a really, I think, basic point on this issue, which is that we have, without doubt, the best military in the world.
Other voices in this conversation
