Mr. Speaker, all of the provisions in this amendment have been previously accepted by the majority in the other bills, H.R. 3222, Even Start, and H.R. 4141 the Safe and Drug-Free Schools, which contained the charitable choice provisions. In the charitable choice part of this provision that allows the Federal funding of faith-based organizations, the first provision of this amendment clarifies that any eligible entity request not subject a participant during the course of a publicly funded fatherhood program to sectarian worship instruction or proselytization. Under the bill, the charitable choice provision only provides that no direct funds can be used for that purpose. This would not, of course, cover privately paid employees or volunteers, who could use the Federal-funded program to promote their sectarian agenda. The concern here is that you have individuals seeking assistance in a federally funded fatherhood program, and in essence they become a captive audience. It is wrong to take advantage of their need for services and essentially require them to participate in a federally sponsored sectarian worship program.
Tim Scott: “Mr. Speaker, all of the provisions in this amendment have been previously accepted by the majority in the other bills…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing provisions of an amendment related to federal funding of faith-based organizations.
Share
More from Tim Scott
His endorsement mattered a lot. It was the changing factor. We think the world of Tim Scott.
She is a conservative stalwart, a hard worker, and represents our beloved state with class, humility, and dignity.
One of the things I will tell you about Lindsey that I think is important to our Scripture today is Philippians 1:6, that he who began a good work is going to be faithful to finish it.
The question we’re asking ourselves today is whether or not she is prepared to serve in the United States Senate and represent the people of South Carolina on the issues that are germane to the moment, with all the issues of the moment.





