Amendment 5 of the Bill of Rights says that ``no person shall be held to answer for a capital or otherwise infamous crime unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury except,'' and then it goes on to say, ``nor to be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.'' Now, the designation by the President is not due process of law. Usually we have a trial. There is no judicial review in this situation. And even the designation as a foreigner, if they happen to be a citizen and are designated as a foreigner, they have no judicial review and no rights under this bill. We ought to go back to the normal process of due process. If we are going to go after criminals, we ought to go after criminals with the normal process of having a trial.
Tim Scott: “Amendment 5 of the Bill of Rights says that ``no person shall be held to answer for a capital or otherwise infamous…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing due process rights in relation to presidential designations of individuals.
Share
More from Tim Scott
I know she is making her brother proud, but Darline has already proven to be her own person: focused on pocketbook issues, defending our South Carolina values, and delivering for the people she represents. Her priorities are our…
Our higher education system is broken. Americans are paying rising costs for college, while the value of their degrees continues to plummet.
Lindsey built a bridge from the Republican side of the aisle to the Democrat side of the aisle, because he believed that there were good people on both sides of the aisle.
The Opportunity Leadership Summit brought today’s leaders together with the next generation, creating opportunities to learn, grow, and inspire.





