the original bill had broad bipartisan support that guaranteed that those who lose their job for any reason can still get health insurance coverage. This bill is loaded up with so many special interest provisions that for the consumer, the poor and the sick, it does more harm than good. The medical savings accounts will allow a few health people to take money out of the Medicare Program, leaving behind a group that are, on average, sicker and, therefore, will have higher health care costs. The malpractice changes are all slanted to help the wrongdoer at the expense of the victim. They only preempt State laws to the extent that they hurt the victim. Incredibly, the bill provides if the victim is hurt worse under State law, then the State law prevails. Mr. Speaker, we should reject the special-interest wrongdoer protections and instead pass the original bipartisan consumer protection health care bill.
Tim Scott: “the original bill had broad bipartisan support that guaranteed that those who lose their job for any reason can still…”
On the recordMarch 28, 1996
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Opposing a health care bill with special interest provisions during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Tim Scott
Aug 7, 2026
done something no other president in the history of our country said yes to, which is complying to the ethics strategy and standard for all elected officials. We’ve never had a president ever say yes to that.
Aug 9, 2026
The American people deserve a government that works for them, and that means keeping the government open and operating.
Jul 23, 2026
In this hyper polarized world that we’re living in, it is so easy for us to make the decision that because you don’t agree with me, you are my enemy.
Aug 13, 2026
By going with [Dr. Abdul] El-Sayed, you're talking about socialism, Marxism, communism, and someone who seems to just not like America.





