What the scientists were telling us is whether you set that standard where it is now or whether you lower it, there is no measurable difference in the health effect on individuals. They could not see any clear level to say, ``Look, if you set it below this particular level, then it will be a great increase in health. This will greatly decrease the adverse health effects.'' They could not find where the line was on ozone to set where it would make any difference in the health. Why would we want to shut down industry? Why would we want to displace jobs, put people out of work to set a line that we are not even certain that the line we are setting has any measurable health effect or any benefit?
Mike Doyle: “What the scientists were telling us is whether you set that standard where it is now or whether you lower it, there is…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of air quality standards and their health effects.
Share
More from Mike Doyle
It is our responsibility on the subcommittee to highlight, as we have in so many hearings, the issues important to the people we represent.
As we continue to decarbonize the electric grid, I hope FERC will continue to be proactive and flexible in its approach to building out a grid with more distributed resources and in recognizing the benefits of innovative technologies.
I am also encouraged by FERC's efforts to finally establish an Office of Public Participation, as well as efforts to prepare for and combat cyber attacks on our energy infrastructure.
Losing over 95,000 Americans to overdoses in 2020 is an unacceptable number. And we need to work fast to reverse this deadly trend.





