Basically what my substitute amendment does is basically what the chairman does in his amendment; we raise the fossil energy and energy conservation levels up to the level in the Interior appropriations conference report. The only difference is for the year 1997, since we are doing a 2-year authorization, that we in 1997 authorize 10 percent less basically in accordance to the language of the House conference report which calls for a 10 percent reduction over the next 4 years. We just do that in 1997. It is basically the same as what the gentleman from Pennsylvania [Mr. Walker] does, with the exception being we are authorizing a 10 percent reduction in 1997 versus a reduction from $380 million to $220 million.
Mike Doyle: “Basically what my substitute amendment does is basically what the chairman does in his amendment; we raise the fossil…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing a substitute amendment related to fossil energy and energy conservation levels.
Share
More from Mike Doyle
As we continue to decarbonize the electric grid, I hope FERC will continue to be proactive and flexible in its approach to building out a grid with more distributed resources and in recognizing the benefits of innovative technologies.
We have all seen the stark reality, highlighted by the ongoing pandemic, that broadband is a necessity.
I look forward to doing that with my friends and colleagues on both sides of the aisle.
Well, thank you very much, Madam Chairwoman, and to both you and Chairman Pallone, for continuing this series of legislative hearings to move forward with common-sense solutions to protect consumers online, and to hold online platforms…





