Political Quotes

On the recordJuly 18, 2012
It is true that a new point of order was created under the Budget Control Act preventing any legislation from being considered in the House that would cause discretionary spending to exceed the caps established in the Budget Control Act. Under that part of the act, Madam Chair, the entire bill is technically out of order because the entire bill exceeds the BCA caps by $7.5 billion. Ironically then, if this point of order is sustained, then we will effectively keep within the shadows a nonpartisan policy, something that everyone has supported in the past, a good governance issue, while allowing the entire bill, which also violates the same point of order, to proceed. My amendment is outlay neutral. It does not increase spending, it does not decrease spending. It simply moves spending from the war budget to the base budget, and vice versa. If the amendment were agreed to, the budget authority in the bill will be exactly the same as it is if the amendment fails, $608,213,000,000. Accordingly, the amendment does not violate section 302(f)(1) of the Congressional Budget Act, and overruling the point of order gives us the chance to abide by the precedent established long ago and embraced by both parties. I respectfully ask that the Chair overrule the point of order. The Acting CHAIR. Does any other Member wish to be heard on the point of order? If not, the Chair is prepared to rule.…
Said by
Mick Mulvaney
Republican · South Carolina
Source
govinfo.gov
Jul 18, 2012

Share

More from Mick Mulvaney

Jan 2, 2023

It's a complete breakdown here tonight, Anderson. There is no question that to have 19 votes against Kevin. It's just -- it is outrageous.

transcripts.cnn.com
Mar 8, 2023

If there is one criticism that I would level against the President is he didn't hire very well.

congress.gov
Aug 11, 2022

I didn`t even know there was a safer at Mar-a-Lago when I was the Chief of Staff for 15 months.

msnbc.com

Other voices in this conversation