I come down on the side of this being a bad bill, for the simple reason that if you care about Corps reform, or if you care about reform to the agencies basically underlying this bill, this bill is a very bad bill. I say that, first of all, if you look at the bill itself, we have in place a somewhat bizarre process, and that is for weeks now we have been sort of in the military mode of ``hurry up and wait'' and ``hurry up and wait'' as we have been waiting for conference reports. Yet, when this bill comes along, it basically speeds through the process with a closed rule, despite the fact it has not been marked up in committee, and the question is why? Why does this speed through this way? Why do we not deal with reform right now? I think the answer, very clearly, is in the way that this bill has spiralled out of control. It spiralled from basically being a $2 billion bill to a $6 billion bill. To me, this bill is similarly nothing more than a feeding frenzy. Sharks are supposedly the ones that feed; but this is a piggy feeding frenzy, when I think about this bill.
Marshall Sanford: “I come down on the side of this being a bad bill, for the simple reason that if you care about Corps reform, or if you…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing a bill related to Corps reform and agency reform during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Marshall Sanford
I was detained this afternoon at Georgetown University Hospital as my youngest son Blake broke his nose last evening and I was attending to him. Had I been present, I would have voted ``yea'' on rollcall No. 616, ``yea'' on rollcall No…
I want to make sure both of you think leaving it alone is best for the people of Puerto Rico.
I thank the gentleman for yielding, and I wanted to join him just for a few moments to simply applaud the way in which he is raising this issue tonight. I think it is incredibly important because it was Jefferson who actually said ``that…
Well, look, if the President can say whatever, why can't I say whatever? He's given them license.





