If, in fact, it is not as lethal and it could be handled by health care professionals rather than cranking up C-17s and sending them across the Atlantic, why not have health care professionals do it rather than $750 million?
Questioning military spending on Ebola response versus using healthcare professionals.
Share
More from Marshall Sanford
I would say, well, I'm for Trump in this area, but I'm against in these different areas. But people didn't want nuance. They want, are you for or against him?
It shows the danger of Donald Trump in my mind, because what it says is somebody as highly elected as Kevin McCarthy will twist himself in knots to stay relevant with the Trump base.
I, humbly, 100 percent totally disagree with you on that one. I mean, if you look at the baseline over the next ten years, we're talking about $86 trillion of spending, right?
The conservative movement, in your view, you write, 'represented by the Republican Party had devolved into a lukewarm mess.'
Other voices in this conversation
