If, in fact, it is not as lethal and it could be handled by health care professionals rather than cranking up C-17s and sending them across the Atlantic, why not have health care professionals do it rather than $750 million?
Marshall Sanford: “If, in fact, it is not as lethal and it could be handled by health care professionals rather than cranking up C-17s and…”
Editor's note · Context
Questioning military spending on Ebola response versus using healthcare professionals.
Share
More from Marshall Sanford
I think it's going to be disastrous. You know, people go down to the local bank because it sends signals that there's stability there. And what the president right now is doing both domestically and internationally, is sending a signal…
It's incredibly disturbing, because leaving the legal issues and the federal election issues and all the other issues that people have been talking about, I think in the last segment you pegged it, which is fundamentally what we have going…
I would say, well, I'm for Trump in this area, but I'm against in these different areas. But people didn't want nuance. They want, are you for or against him?





