I stand before you and the rest of this body to encourage the adoption of the line-item veto. In fact, I have a scary couple of numbers here in front of me. What do $1.75 million for national pig research have in common with $1.7 million for plant stress have in common with $600,000 to ease fish migration up a western river? The thing they all have in common is I cannot do anything about them. I came here to affect the way Government is spending money, and yet the way Congress works is that I cannot get my hands on them. The line-item veto would allow the President to do what 43 Governors can do, and that is to reach in, say this is a piece of fat, it does not make sense and it needs to go. Please vote with me for the line-item veto.
Marshall Sanford: “I stand before you and the rest of this body to encourage the adoption of the line-item veto. In fact, I have a scary…”
Editor's note · Context
Advocating for the adoption of the line-item veto during a congressional debate.
Share
More from Marshall Sanford
I think it's going to be disastrous. You know, people go down to the local bank because it sends signals that there's stability there. And what the president right now is doing both domestically and internationally, is sending a signal…
I thank the gentleman for yielding, and I wanted to join him just for a few moments to simply applaud the way in which he is raising this issue tonight. I think it is incredibly important because it was Jefferson who actually said ``that…
Time will tell. I mean, that was the statement of my opponent last night. This is the party of Donald J. Trump and I could not more vigorously disagree.
Wouldn't it make sense to again enact that repeal for a longer time period so that more aid at a lower cost could go into Puerto Rico?





