On the recordSeptember 11, 1997
this bill--for the first time in law--would establish a definition for the term ``compatible.'' This is one of the single most important aspects of this legislation. Too often in the past, activities have been allowed on refuges that have harmed the fish and wildlife and habitats that these areas were designed to protect. There has been some concern that the definition used in the bill is overly vague. The bill defines a compatible use as one that will not ``materially interfere with or detract from the purpose of a refuge or the mission of the Refuge System.'' The House committee report on this bill further clarified that what this language means is that a use is compatible if it will not have a tangible adverse impact on refuge purposes. Is it also your understanding that this is what is meant by this definition?
Source
govinfo.gov




