On the recordJanuary 29, 2020
I send a question to the desk from myself and Senator Cruz. The CHIEF JUSTICE. Senator Graham and Senator Cruz pose this question for the House managers: In Mr. Schiff's hypothetical, if President Obama had evidence that Mitt Romney's son was being paid $1 million per year by a corrupt Russian company--and Mitt Romney had acted to benefit that company--would Obama have authority to ask that that potential corruption be investigated? Mr. Manager SCHIFF. First of all, the hypothetical is a bit off because it presumes in that hypothetical that President Obama was acting corruptly or there was evidence he was acting corruptly with respect to his son. But, nonetheless, let's take your hypothetical on its terms. Would it have been impeachable if Barack Obama had tried to get Medvedev to do an investigation of Mitt Romney, whether it was justified or unjustified? The reality is, for a President to withhold military aid from an ally--or, in the hypothetical, to withhold it to benefit an adversary--to target their political opponent is wrong and corrupt--period, end of story. If you allow a President to rationalize that conduct, rationalize jeopardizing the Nation's security to benefit himself because he believes that his opponent should be investigated by a foreign power, that is impeachable. If you have a legitimate reason to think that any U.S. person has committed an offense, there are legitimate ways to have an investigation conducted.…





