Lindsey Graham's proposal would be radical, extreme anti-democracy, and it would violate state law because the Pennsylvania State laws already said you do it by popular vote, it would violate federal law, which says you can't make the change after election day and would violate the constitution.
Critique of Lindsey Graham's suggestion to potentially change electors in Pennsylvania, emphasizing its legal and constitutional implications.
Share
More from Lindsey Graham
I think this is going to happen in 2026… and it can't happen until Iran's in a box. If we get a deal, if we get a deal, Iran will be in a box. If we don't get a deal… Iran will be in a box.
We're not giving any money to Iran that can change the course of history to try diplomacy. Is the MOU problematic? Yes. I would rather try diplomacy than take it off the table. The money Iran gets is not going to change the future of Iran.
I am somewhat concerned that Iran’s view of the agreement seems different than what the American negotiating team is claiming.
Other voices in this conversation
