If the $521 billion were not reduced or diminished by the offset of the Social Security surplus, which is about $160 billion, it would instead be $681 billion, instead of $521 billion. In truth, he was here when we voted to do it. We have taken Social Security off budget. We acknowledge that the moneys in that trust fund are being accumulated today to be spent in the very near future, and they should not be consolidated with and diminish other accounts. You should look at the budget bottom line without offsetting the Social Security surplus gains.
John Spratt: “If the $521 billion were not reduced or diminished by the offset of the Social Security surplus, which is about $160…”
On the recordMarch 23, 2004
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the impact of the Social Security surplus on the federal budget.
Share
More from John Spratt
Jul 15, 2009
Let me get something clear. There are a hundred and three operating nuclear reactors, commercial reactors in operation generating spent fuel waste.
Dec 8, 2009
When President Obama was sworn into office at the beginning of this year, the economy was in deep contraction and jobs were being lost at a rate of 741,000 per month.
Dec 8, 2009
The positive impact of the Recovery Act is already being made apparent, and more economic activity will be generated as stimulus dollars continue to spend out.
Dec 8, 2009
I want to welcome everyone to our hearing this morning on The Social Safety Net: Impact of the Recession and of the Recovery Act.





