Everybody promised. Both parties, both the White House and the Congress, promised that never again, now that we were finally in this position, would we borrow from Social Security and spend the proceeds again. But that is the inevitable consequence. When you reduce that $5.6 trillion projected surplus by 55 percent, the result is about $2.6 trillion instead of $5.6 trillion. That $2.6 trillion is roughly equal to what is in the Social Security Trust Fund, so if you wanted to keep your promise now that you have adjusted downward the realistic estimate of the surplus, there was no room for additional tax cuts without violating that solemn promise never again to dip into the Social Security Trust Fund to pay for the operation of the government.
John Spratt: “Everybody promised. Both parties, both the White House and the Congress, promised that never again, now that we were…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of reduced surplus on Social Security funding.
Share
More from John Spratt
I ask unanimous consent that before concluding that members who did not have an opportunity to ask questions of our witness be given 7 days to submit questions for the record.
Mr. Speaker, the reconciliation bill before us does more than advance the cause of health care. It makes a landmark investment in education, one that will make college more affordable for millions of students, and all without adding a dime…
The positive impact of the Recovery Act is already being made apparent, and more economic activity will be generated as stimulus dollars continue to spend out.
Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of this historic legislation, arguably the most important vote we here today will ever take in this Chamber. Today fulfills a promise made 100 years ago by Theodore Roosevelt when he first called for…





