Political Quotes

John Spratt: Typically not. That means they will be added to the total amount of spending. It will go straight to the bottom line…

On the recordMarch 18, 2003
Typically not. That means they will be added to the total amount of spending. It will go straight to the bottom line, because, as I said, there is no surplus anymore to absorb the amount of money that will be needed, $50-, $100 billion, whatever it may be, and that applies also to the cost of an occupation after the war. The postwar occupation was estimated by the Congressional Budget Office at a cost of $1.8 billion per month to $3.8 billion per month, depending upon the difficulty, the size of the force. We could easily have an occupation force there trying to rebuild Iraq after the war of over 100,000 troops. General Shinsheki, who last commanded the reconstruction forces in Bosnia, has more experience than anybody. He estimated they needed over 100,000 troops, and that would cost us on the upper end of that estimate. All of this has to be added to the budget.
Said by
John Spratt
South Carolina

Editor's note · Context

Discussing the financial implications of postwar occupation in Iraq.

Share

More from John Spratt

May 20, 2009

This year, Congress has passed and the President has signed into law a $787 billion recovery package to spur demand and create 3 million new jobs.

congress.gov
Jun 18, 2009

Insurance companies should not be allowed to cherry pick those who they cover based upon pre-existing conditions.

congress.gov
May 27, 2010

This bill fully funds national security activities in the Departments of Defense and Energy, including top-line funding increases for DOD as well as fully funding Iraq and Afghanistan operations. This is the fourth consecutive year that…

govinfo.gov
Jun 18, 2009

We must respect the right of individuals to choose health insurance and providers.

congress.gov

Other voices in this conversation