Our resolution contains $16.3 billion over the next 10 years specifically earmarked for health care initiatives for military retirees over the age of 65. Our alternative includes the funding that would be necessary to cover the major provisions of H.R. 3655, a bill that was introduced by the gentleman from Hawaii (Mr. Abercrombie) who is the ranking Democrat on the Military Personnel Subcommittee of the House Committee on Armed Services, the gentleman from Missouri (Mr. Skelton) who is the ranking Democrat on the House Committee on Armed Services, and the gentleman from Mississippi (Mr. Taylor). Over that 10-year period, our Democratic alternative provides $5.4 billion in Function 550 for a prescription drug initiative and $10.9 billion in Function 570, the Medicare function, to provide for what we call around here Medicare subvention, to make military retirees over the age of 65 able to use their Medicare benefits at military treatment facilities. This is a major initiative and a major distinction between our budget and their budget.
John Spratt: “Our resolution contains $16.3 billion over the next 10 years specifically earmarked for health care initiatives for…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing budget allocations for health care initiatives for military retirees during a House floor debate.
Share
More from John Spratt
Mr. Speaker, the reconciliation bill before us does more than advance the cause of health care. It makes a landmark investment in education, one that will make college more affordable for millions of students, and all without adding a dime…
simply giving away pollute-for-free allowances to certain industries does not work.
I was a member of Congress and served on the House Armed Services Committee, when the ``Don't Ask, Don't Tell'' policy was adopted. It was a clever solution, but the policy and its consequences deserve an updated review. The Secretary of…
shouldn't we stop creating new programs, now agencies, new commissions and new discretionary spending?





