I will admit that this draft that we have before us does smooth the sharpest edges off the original earlier drafts that dealt with ballistic missile defense and the ABM Treaty. But this bill would require the President to renegotiate the treaty with the Russians now, when START II has yet to be ratified, and the politics in Russia are hardly propitious for ratification. Second, it would imply that the United States should break out of the treaty if the Russians do not agree to the amendments we want, permitting multiple sites, unlimited interceptors, and space-based sensors, and it would require the testing of a chemical laser in orbit in 1999, which would be a violation of the treaty. I believe that we should develop and deploy a ground-based missile defense system. I think we will also want to deploy space-based sensors, and I think that both of these features, plus more, will probably require changes and revisions in the ABM Treaty, but nothing requires us to negotiate those changes just now, right now.
John Spratt: “I will admit that this draft that we have before us does smooth the sharpest edges off the original earlier drafts that…”
On the recordJanuary 3, 1996
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of a bill related to ballistic missile defense and the ABM Treaty.
Share
More from John Spratt
May 20, 2009
This year, Congress has passed and the President has signed into law a $787 billion recovery package to spur demand and create 3 million new jobs.
Jun 2, 2009
I ask unanimous consent that before concluding that members who did not have an opportunity to ask questions of our witness be given 7 days to submit questions for the record.
Mar 25, 2010
Mr. Speaker, the reconciliation bill before us does more than advance the cause of health care. It makes a landmark investment in education, one that will make college more affordable for millions of students, and all without adding a dime…





