Mr. Chairman, let me put a few things about this debate in perspective. There has been a lot of talk on the floor today about tax increases, tax cuts and spending increases. Let me try to put the tax cuts, in particular, in perspective. In 2001, with what seemed to be a substantial surplus, there was a case to be made for tax reduction. I disagreed with the distribution that was proposed and particularly with the size, and I said right here in the well of the House, if my colleagues pass a tax cut of this size and if the surplus does not pan out and it could disappear in the blink of an economist's eye, I said, we are going to find the budget right back in the red again, borrowing and spending the Social Security trust fund. And, unfortunately, that is exactly what has happened. So a person could have made a case in 2001, but today, that case no longer applies because there is no surplus today. It is gone. It vanished. We only have deficits as far out as the forecasters project their forecast.
John Spratt: “Mr. Chairman, let me put a few things about this debate in perspective. There has been a lot of talk on the floor today…”
On the recordMarch 24, 2004
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of tax cuts and budget deficits during a House debate.
Share
More from John Spratt
Dec 8, 2009
Failed Republican economic policies had brought the financial system dangerously close to a complete meltdown and had driven the economy into its deepest recession since the 1930s.
May 20, 2009
an approach which relies on giveaways instead of relying upon auctions would, represent the largest corporate welfare program that has ever been enacted in the history of the United States.
May 27, 2010
This bill fully funds national security activities in the Departments of Defense and Energy, including top-line funding increases for DOD as well as fully funding Iraq and Afghanistan operations. This is the fourth consecutive year that…





