reclaiming my time, to wrap it up, looking back, we started off talking about the deficit and accumulation of debt. Here is what we have accomplished, this Congress and this administration, in 3 years: The first year, instead of paying down the debt as the Clinton administration had done for 3 years in a row, they raised the debt ceiling by $450 billion. That was good for just 1 year. The next year, 2003, they raised the debt ceiling again by $984 billion, the biggest increase ever; and it has lasted for 15 months. Waiting in the wings right now is another debt ceiling increase of $690 billion; and what it is waiting on is a bill to which it can be attached, a vehicle that can carry it to passage with as few fingerprints on it as possible because nobody wants to be responsible for passing that kind of debt ceiling increase. So the Treasury is reduced to engaging in a lot of gimmicks with Federal retirement funds, for example, in order that we can tie things over until finally that debt-ceiling increase can be passed. In 3 years we will have raised the debt ceiling by $2.1 trillion. Compare that to the previous 8 years, and it is a phenomenal and depressing reversal.
John Spratt: “reclaiming my time, to wrap it up, looking back, we started off talking about the deficit and accumulation of debt. Here…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the increase in the national debt and debt ceiling during a congressional session.
Share
More from John Spratt
The moral of the story is, if the leaders of both parties don't want a commission to succeed, if the leaders of both parties aren't willing to put both parts of the budget, taxes and spending, on the table, the chances that it is going to…
We convene today to review the state of our economy, a dismal state, and its interaction with the budget.
To supplement my remarks about statutory PAYGO, I would like to include in the Record the attached section of the bill. Madam Speaker, at the outset of the 1990s, the Congress passed the Budget Enforcement Act for a simple purpose: to…
Insurance companies should not be allowed to cherry pick those who they cover based upon pre-existing conditions.





