I would like to spend more, too. But in this agreement we have provided $8.5 billion in outlays for transportation over and above what the President's request was for fiscal year 1998, $8.15 billion over 5 years. That means that in fiscal year 1998, obligations for highways will go up to $22.2 billion, as opposed to $20.9 billion in this year's budget. That is a 6 percent increase, not a whopping increase, but compare it to the one-half of 1 percent average increase in discretionary spending over the next 5 years and it is a handsome, favorable treatment for transportation. The gentleman from Minnesota [Mr. Oberstar] makes a powerful argument. He said, we only want to make a four-tenths of 1 percent cut across the board, but that four-tenths of 1 percent wreaks havoc with some major programs. Let us start with defense. We barely, barely increase defense, $6 billion over the next 5 years. Pass this resolution and you will take $5.6 billion in outlays out of defense.
John Spratt: “I would like to spend more, too. But in this agreement we have provided $8.5 billion in outlays for transportation over…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing transportation funding and defense spending in the context of a budget agreement.
Share
More from John Spratt
Under Democratic leadership, the 111th Congress moved swiftly to enact the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, which has jump started economic activity.
This year, Congress has passed and the President has signed into law a $787 billion recovery package to spur demand and create 3 million new jobs.
Every child in America deserves health care coverage. We cannot continue to place selfish ideology above the health of our children.
Mr. Speaker, the reconciliation bill before us does more than advance the cause of health care. It makes a landmark investment in education, one that will make college more affordable for millions of students, and all without adding a dime…





