First of all, at a time when our trade deficit is reaching record highs, this bill, H.R. 2644, is totally one-sided. It lowers tariffs, it lifts quotas on apparel and six or seven different kinds of imports from 26 countries in the Caribbean and Central America, and it does so unilaterally. These countries are not required to make in return any trade concessions whatsoever to the United States. Second, this is a blanket grant of trade benefit to these CBI countries without any sanctions, without even any questions being asked about sweatshops or child labor or whether or not the country in question cooperates with the United States when it comes to interdicting drugs, money laundering and dealing with corrupt practices and corrupt customs, and those problems are endemic in some of these countries. Why do we do this? Why do we make these unilateral concessions? All in the name of fixing a nonexistent problem.
John Spratt: “First of all, at a time when our trade deficit is reaching record highs, this bill, H.R. 2644, is totally one-sided. It…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing H.R. 2644 and discussing its implications for trade and labor standards.
Share
More from John Spratt
I want to thank Congresswoman Gwen Moore for suggesting this hearing and for her role in bringing it about and putting it together.
The moral of the story is, if the leaders of both parties don't want a commission to succeed, if the leaders of both parties aren't willing to put both parts of the budget, taxes and spending, on the table, the chances that it is going to…
Under Democratic leadership, the 111th Congress moved swiftly to enact the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, which has jump started economic activity.
I ask unanimous consent that before concluding that members who did not have an opportunity to ask questions of our witness be given 7 days to submit questions for the record.





