We know that 1.7 million taxpayers last year had to deal with the AMT, the Alternative Minimum Tax. We know from the Treasury Department over the next 10 years that number will grow to 39 million taxpayers, mostly middle income Americans. The gentleman was here when that bill passed. I was here. It was not intended for middle income Americans. It was intended for upper bracket taxpayers. Consequently, when they find out that deductions and credits and preferences that we promised them in the Tax Code are not fully available because of this thing called the AMT, they are not going to like it. They will be numerous, rising to 39 million taxpayers. I am sure we will eventually relent and have to modify that and should modify the AMT. But every time we bring it up and say you have to factor this in to the future planning for revenues, sooner or later we have to do something about the AMT, it gets shoved forward, gets ignored. That is another element that was simply omitted in the consideration of this budget and a reason we said this is not a real budget.
John Spratt: “We know that 1.7 million taxpayers last year had to deal with the AMT, the Alternative Minimum Tax. We know from the…”
On the recordMarch 20, 2002
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the impact of the Alternative Minimum Tax on middle-income taxpayers.
Share
More from John Spratt
Jun 2, 2009
I ask unanimous consent that before concluding that members who did not have an opportunity to ask questions of our witness be given 7 days to submit questions for the record.
Jul 15, 2009
I think it is a bit irresponsible to at least articulate to the American people, to the Congress, why you think we need a new policy direction.
Jul 19, 2010
I join other members of the South Carolina delegation in cheering the University of South Carolina baseball team and Coach Ray Tanner for winning the 2010 College World Series. I extend special congratulations to Coach Tanner for being…





