Mr. Chairman, we keep having a red herring dragged across the path of this debate. The principal budgeting contention on the floor, the alternative to their budget is our budget and it commits 100 percent to Social Security, is backed up by a statute which requires the treasurer to take a certain percentage of payroll taxes to buy down public debt. The general public probably does not understand, but points of order are honored in the breach on the House floor. We have a Committee on Rules upstairs which specializes in overriding points of order. It is a joke to say that a point of order provides any protection whatsoever.
John Spratt: “Mr. Chairman, we keep having a red herring dragged across the path of this debate. The principal budgeting contention on…”
On the recordMarch 25, 1999
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing budgetary issues and the treatment of Social Security during a House debate.
Share
More from John Spratt
Jun 18, 2009
Insurance companies should not be allowed to cherry pick those who they cover based upon pre-existing conditions.
May 20, 2009
I think it is a widely held view that all of those actions have had positive effects on the economy.
Dec 17, 2010
I thank the gentleman for yielding and rise in emphatic support of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011. This bill, as befits its title, makes record investments in our Nation's military, authorizing $725…
Dec 8, 2009
When President Obama was sworn into office at the beginning of this year, the economy was in deep contraction and jobs were being lost at a rate of 741,000 per month.





