Mr. Speaker, this is another rule that was passed late at night to bring to the floor a conference report that, in all due respect, does not deserve the name. It is hard to call this a conference report when nobody has conferred. We have had no consultation. There is no mutuality in the process, so it is not hard to believe that there will be no mutuality, no common ground, in the final result. I am not just saying this because I am miffed at being left out of the process. If you cannot take rejection, you better not be in politics. But we set a model 3 years ago for how to do this. We sat down and tried to negotiate a common agreement, given the fact that we have a divided government, and, when we got to the end, it was a pretty good product. We called it the Balanced Budget Agreement of 1997. We have not had such mutuality, such collegiality, since, and certainly not in this result here. As I said, I am not miffed, but we have meritorious arguments to make.
John Spratt: “Mr. Speaker, this is another rule that was passed late at night to bring to the floor a conference report that, in all…”
Editor's note · Context
Criticizing the lack of consultation in the process of a conference report.
Share
More from John Spratt
We are the Budget Committee, not the Energy Committee, and it is not our job to draft energy bills.
Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of this historic legislation, arguably the most important vote we here today will ever take in this Chamber. Today fulfills a promise made 100 years ago by Theodore Roosevelt when he first called for…
This bill fully funds national security activities in the Departments of Defense and Energy, including top-line funding increases for DOD as well as fully funding Iraq and Afghanistan operations. This is the fourth consecutive year that…
Let me get something clear. There are a hundred and three operating nuclear reactors, commercial reactors in operation generating spent fuel waste.





