The point, I am sure, is you are supportive of all of the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts. You are limited by procedural rules to only dealing with that which is in the scope of the two resolutions. But, in fact, I am sure you are supportive of that. If that is true, you have to acknowledge that the number is $231 billion. That is the revenue impact of extending all of the tax cuts. If you add 96, which is the surplus you project, you get a big, big number. Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
John Spratt: “The point, I am sure, is you are supportive of all of the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts. You are limited by procedural rules to…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the revenue impact of extending tax cuts during a debate.
Share
More from John Spratt
Failed Republican economic policies had brought the financial system dangerously close to a complete meltdown and had driven the economy into its deepest recession since the 1930s.
Mr. Speaker, the reconciliation bill before us does more than advance the cause of health care. It makes a landmark investment in education, one that will make college more affordable for millions of students, and all without adding a dime…
I think it is a bit irresponsible to at least articulate to the American people, to the Congress, why you think we need a new policy direction.
The moral of the story is, if the leaders of both parties don't want a commission to succeed, if the leaders of both parties aren't willing to put both parts of the budget, taxes and spending, on the table, the chances that it is going to…





