I do not feel that our colleagues on the other side of the aisle, the answer in their Patients' Bill of Rights was to have unlimited lawsuits, which in my opinion would drive up the cost of health care and destroy our HMOs, versus what you are planning to do is to make changes, to make sure that people have access and adequate care. Is that correct?
Discussing the implications of the Patients' Bill of Rights during a debate on health care.
Share
More from Joe Cunningham
I support Land and Water Conservation Fund, but I do not support it unless it is paired with coastal impact assistance.
If the American Society of Civil Engineers has given our wastewater infrastructure a recent grade of D-plus, how on earth are we going to secure clean water if we don't step it up with dramatically increased funding?
Other voices in this conversation
