On the recordFebruary 8, 1995
If you can demonstrate there is newly discovered evidence which you couldn't have easily and reasonably discovered the first time around, and if it's clear and convincing evidence that if it goes before a court would result in innocence, then you can go produce that. Mr. Chairman, it is clearly written into our bill. What we say here is based on a factual predicate that could not have been discovered through the exercise of reasonable diligence in time to present the claim for State or Federal postconviction review the first time around, and the facts underlying the claim would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that but for constitutional error no reasonable factfinder would have found the petitioner guilty of the underlying offense.
Source
govinfo.gov




