On the recordOctober 11, 2013
I thank the gentleman for yielding me the time. Mr. Speaker, I want to speak on this bill because I have worked very hard over the years helping to put together various farm bills, and this is one that I felt very, very good about from the outset. I even felt okay when the bill came back from the Senate. Although I had some issues with the Senate version, I thought that what we were doing made some sense. But we have reached a point with this bill--$40 billion in cuts to the food stamp program--that will not only impact negatively those people who would receive those stamps in fighting off poverty or hunger, but it would do tremendous harm to various community outlets-- stores, family-owned markets--where so much of the income of small businesses depend upon this program and what it will do to help further the economy in various communities. I am also very concerned that in this legislation, we treat the recipients of food stamps as if they are responsible for what may or may not have taken place with respect to drug addiction to children or to siblings. I think there is something erroneous about drug testing in order to receive food stamps. I think that if you are going to have drug testing to get Federal assistance, then we ought to test all those people who get farm subsidies and see whether or not they are deserving of such assistance from the Federal Government. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The time of the gentleman has expired. Mr. McGOVERN.…





