I just want to comment to the gentleman from Alabama, I certainly agree with the points he is making. I might make a couple of comments in addition. Any highway project at any time probably has been called pork by somebody. So we almost have a choice of doing no highway construction at all in the country or doing projects that possibly somebody, some small minority someplace, is going to call pork. But we have got to do this construction. All of this legislation we deal with, whatever subject it involves, it has to get specific in many different ways. But we run the risk if this amendment passes that if we get specific in highway legislation from now on, it would put this money back on budget and it would start being used for all these other things, foreign aid and everything else, instead of being used for highway construction and the purposes for which it was designated, which is what the American people want. So I rise in opposition and join the gentleman from Alabama in his opposition to this amendment.
Jeff Duncan: “I just want to comment to the gentleman from Alabama, I certainly agree with the points he is making. I might make a…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing an amendment related to highway construction funding.
Share
More from Jeff Duncan
We are showing how misguided this $27 billion green bank is, and the gentleman from Pennsylvania (Mr. Joyce) knows about fossil fuel production and what this would mean to the great State of Pennsylvania that produces a lot of energy. Mr…
This election is going to be determined by a group of folks that don't like the - almost every one of Joe Biden's policies, or a majority of those policies. But they just are going to have to wake up and feel like he's a safer option to…
Just a point. The payback periods for many of these appliances are uneconomical. Republicans look long term. Republicans look toward quality and value for Americans. For example, the payback period for the Department of Energy's proposed…
I thank the gentleman for the time, and I rise in support of S. 870, which includes a bipartisan and bicameral nuclear energy package. I first thank my colleague, friend, and ranking member of the Subcommittee on Energy, Climate, and Grid…





