allow me to review briefly the actions taken by the National Security Committee on the Cooperative Threat Reduction [CTR] Program in H.R. 3230. First, the committee cut the $327 million budget request by $25 million. Specifically, as based on the availability of prior-year funds, the committee cut $20 million from the fissile material storage facility in Russia. The committee also cut approximately $4 million from chemical weapons destruction-related activities in Russia. Specifically, the committee denied the DOD request to initiate a new, as yet unjustified demolition project and reduced the amount for the Chemical Weapons Destruction Support Office, an information clearinghouse located in Moscow. The committee also cut $1 million from CTR program overhead. The bill also includes a provision that is intended to ensure that CTR funds are spent only on core dismantlement activities, such as destroying bombers, missiles, and silos. My colleagues may recall that noncore activities such as environmental restoration, job retraining, and defense conversion have been at the heart of the controversy surrounding this program in past years. This provision would prohibit use of fiscal year 1997 or prior-year, unobligated CTR funds for conducting peacekeeping activities with Russia, providing housing, performing environmental restoration, providing job retraining assistance, or for providing assistance to promote defense conversion.
Floyd Spence: “allow me to review briefly the actions taken by the National Security Committee on the Cooperative Threat Reduction…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing budget cuts and provisions related to the Cooperative Threat Reduction Program.
Share
More from Floyd Spence
Mr. Speaker, while I do not agree with all of my colleague's statements, I am in complete agreement with him that this Nation needs to do everything in its power to protect American troops deployed around the world. In fact, when it comes…
Mr. Speaker, the motion by the gentleman from Missouri speaks to an uncontroversial provision offered by the gentleman from Mississippi (Mr. Taylor) and adopted by a voice vote on June 10 during House consideration of H.R. 1401. Section…
The conferees were particularly aware of and therefore careful to avoid changes in law that could inadvertently result in changes to existing environmental clean-up efforts. For this reason, the conference report contains a number of…





