Mr. Chairman, we are going to have more time to talk about this, but basically I would note that it is the serious opinion of many, many scholars, including at least some lawyers in the Department of State, that the so-called arms embargo on Bosnia is illegal on its face. How can the West tell a sovereign country, a sovereign people, a sovereign nation that they cannot defend themselves? If they do do that, they have to provide--and this is in the U.N. documents--adequate defense and protection. No one can say we have provided adequate defense and protection. A better analogy would be that the United Nations, the world community right now is in the process of enforcing an arms embargo against the Kurdish people being victimized by Iraqi forces and aggression, moving into the Kurdish areas of Iraq and that region. The Government and people of Bosnia have committed no infraction of the U.N. Charter. If anyone is an innocent victim in all of this, it is the Bosnians, who, I might note, involve all ethnic factions and peoples--Jews, Croatians, Moslems, and Serbs. There are hundreds of thousands of Serbs, Mr. Chairman, who want no part of Karadjic and Milosevic.
Floyd Spence: “Mr. Chairman, we are going to have more time to talk about this, but basically I would note that it is the serious…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the legality of the arms embargo on Bosnia during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Floyd Spence
Mr. Speaker, the motion by the gentleman from Missouri speaks to an uncontroversial provision offered by the gentleman from Mississippi (Mr. Taylor) and adopted by a voice vote on June 10 during House consideration of H.R. 1401. Section…
I am personally saddened to hear of the remarks attributed to Ms. Sara Lister relative to the Marine Corps. I cannot go into detail, I do not have enough time to make a speech on behalf of the Corps and in defense of the Corps, but I would…
Mr. Speaker, H.R. 4 is a 15-word bill stating, and I quote, ``That it is the policy of the United States to deploy a national missile defense.'' The bill is clear in its intent, elegant in its simplicity and reflects a bipartisan belief…
H.R. 4205 simply removes the sunset date for the rules on the procurement of non-U.S. ball and roller bearings. Bearings remain among the items specified in title X, section 2534, as being subject to the requirements of that section.





