Mr. Chairman, North Korea, lest we forget, is one of the most anti-American and potentially dangerous countries in the world. The administration's efforts to contain North Korea's nuclear weapons ambitions by providing modern nuclear reactors for its energy needs have done little to dissuade North Korea from pursuing a nuclear weapons program. In fact, contrary to the conventional wisdom, the reactors being provided would not eliminate North Korea's ability to produce sufficient quantities of fissile material that could be used to build nuclear weapons. Incredibly, it now appears that the administration may indemnify companies involved in the construction of these reactors and actually they would leave American taxpayers footing the bill for nuclear accidents in North Korea. I cannot believe it. This would, essentially, hold the United States taxpayer hostage to the operation of nuclear reactors over which we have no control in a Stalinist country hostile to the United States and which is developing ballistic missiles capable of striking our country with weapons of mass destruction. The Cox-Markey amendment would prevent this from happening. The costs of a future nuclear reactor accident in North Korea could be astronomical and ought not to be paid for by our taxpayers. Mr. Chairman, the amendment makes good common sense. I support it. I urge my colleagues to do the same thing.
Floyd Spence: “Mr. Chairman, North Korea, lest we forget, is one of the most anti-American and potentially dangerous countries in the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing concerns over U.S. policy towards North Korea's nuclear ambitions and the implications for taxpayers.
Share
More from Floyd Spence
Mr. Chairman, we are in the process of negotiating a settlement of this matter. In the meantime, I would like to take this additional time to explain what we have before us today. As I said a few moments ago, this budget that we have…
I rise in support of H.R. 2386, the United States-Taiwan Anti-Ballistic Missile Defense Cooperation Act. In my opinion, issues of national security have been ignored for far too long in the debate over the People's Republic of China. While…
What is a higher priority than defending the lives of all the people of this great country? We are talking about cutting today. I would like to remind the gentleman that the defense budget, which includes the intelligence budget, has taken…
Mr. Speaker, the motion by the gentleman from Missouri speaks to an uncontroversial provision offered by the gentleman from Mississippi (Mr. Taylor) and adopted by a voice vote on June 10 during House consideration of H.R. 1401. Section…





