Nobody knows better than Dick Blumenthal the tragedy of the families of Sandy Hook and the lies that were told about what took place that day.
Sheldon Whitehouse
The Public Record
Sheldon Whitehouse is a United States Senator from Rhode Island, serving since January 4, 2007. A member of the Democratic Party, Whitehouse has focused on a range of issues including environmental protection, healthcare reform, and campaign finance reform. He has been a vocal advocate for addressing climate change and has worked to promote policies aimed at reducing carbon emissions and protecting natural resources. Whitehouse has also been involved in efforts to reform the political campaign finance system, emphasizing the need for transparency and accountability in political donations.
I would be prepared to make a bet that if we took a vote on a plain Section 230 repeal, it would clear this Committee with virtually every vote.
These warnings come from central bankers, economists, assets managers, insurance companies, investment banks, credit rating agencies, and leading management consultations.
Even the Citizens United justices recognized that unlimited political spending without transparency would be corrupting.
We've seen political money flow through 501(c)(4)s in explosive, unexpected numbers.
That boundary between a 501(c)(3) and a 501(c)(4) is something that I think is worth protecting.
I think the idea of a Swiss bank account is more and more in the rearview mirror because of FATCA.
I would be prepared to make a bet that if we took a vote on a plain Section 230 repeal, it would clear this Committee with virtually every vote.
Nobody knows better than Dick Blumenthal the tragedy of the families of Sandy Hook and the lies that were told about what took place that day.
I think it is actually a tainted doctrine that was cooked up and designed with the specific intention of favoring certain classes of litigants.
I think the chances for significant bipartisan accomplishments are very, very real here, and I look forward to supporting you both in those endeavors.
I think it is actually a tainted doctrine that was cooked up and designed with the specific intention of favoring certain classes of litigants.
I want to just make sure that's clear in this room. We are not uniform in our view that originalism is something you need to adhere to.
I think the chances for significant bipartisan accomplishments are very, very real here, and I look forward to supporting you both in those endeavors.
I don't think you need much more to be a good judge than to know the Constitution, to understand what words mean.
I think the chances for significant bipartisan accomplishments are very, very real here, and I look forward to supporting you both in those endeavors.
I think it is actually a tainted doctrine that was cooked up and designed with the specific intention of favoring certain classes of litigants.
So we take a certain amount of pride in the Brownfields Program around Rhode Island, because it has good Rhode Island fingerprints all over it.
There`s a compelling array of circumstantial evidence that this court is captured and that is the problem.





