They are undertaking significant national investment in artificial intelligence and quantum computing that is dwarfing anything that the Administration is proposing or suggesting.
The last election there was Russian influence. This election, they seem to be more prepared.
Passing on relevant intelligence is not actively disrupting the operations of an opponent. Do you agree?
the Chinese activity to appropriate our intellectual property is obvious.
Collecting intelligence, then acting on it in a coordinated fashion, are two different things.
But has he singled out the Russian threat, which appears to be critical to this election coming up?
But you need more. I will take that as a yes.
Do you have the technologists, the computer experts that can begin to understand how these cryptocurrencies work?
This has been an extraordinarily thoughtful presentation by the witnesses.
A theme seems to be appearing that there is not a binary choice between war and diplomacy.
I am also concerned that there is a lot of cavalier talk about war and limited strikes with North Korea.