I really looked forward to this session of Congress primarily because I knew we were going to be reauthorizing ESEA, and Head Start. I looked forward to doing that because others seem to be joining in my crusade to bring about quality in these two areas. In the past, Mr. Chairman, so many times the auditors went out only to look to see whether the pennies went to where someone thought the pennies should go. No one looked to see whether or not there was, in fact, quality in the programs. Mr. Chairman, I am not condemning the programs. I am saying the programs have not been good enough in order to help the disadvantaged become less disadvantaged, or not disadvantaged at all. Therefore, I looked forward to the fact that we were really going to emphasize quality. We have spent a total of $38 billion on chapter 1. We have spent a total $27 billion on Head Start. We never recompleted any Head Start Program, and, as I said, the auditors were not looking for quality.
Editor's note · Context
The speaker discusses the need for quality in education programs like ESEA and Head Start.
Share
More from William F. Goodling
I am a little confused as to where the administration stands on school construction. Back in 1995, we had a rescission of the funding that was already appropriated, and then in the President's 1996 budget he put no money in for any kind of…
my only regret, as I leave this institution, is that the first 20 years I sat there in the minority trying to make everybody understand that the thing that is driving local school districts up the wall more than anything else is the fact…
As a matter of fact, Mr. Speaker, two budgets submitted by the White House in a row had a decrease in funding for special education, 2 years in a row.
Over 25 years, $90 million a year for 25 years, that sounds like big money to me.





