I hate to rise in opposition to the amendment of my dear friend, the gentlewoman from Hawaii, but I do have some real concerns. I would hope the chairman would have hearings on this issue before we make this kind of an investment. There are some concerns which I have, with this amendment. For instance, the proposal really goes beyond research because we are asking them to make recommendations which could be setting policies in a way that represents a new and unwarranted Federal intrusion into the very heart of State and local control of education; that is, taxing and funding decisions. The actions required by the amendment may be the foundation activities for involving the Federal Government in creating funding equity across the States, so I would hope that we could delay this and have hearings on the whole issue, and perhaps come back and not include it in this reauthorization.
Editor's note · Context
Opposing an amendment related to federal involvement in education funding during House floor debate.
Share
More from William F. Goodling
I pleaded with the President, and I said, he can talk about class size reduction, but if he does not have a quality teacher to put in that new classroom, I will guarantee it does not matter whether the teacher-to-pupil ratio is 12 to 1, 20…
in IDEA, as we indicated, for instance, they were promised 40 percent of the average expenditure for students all over this country. Now, 2 years ago, that average expenditure per pupil was about $6300. If they were getting their 40…
I commend our country's music teachers for their efforts and for the role they play in the lives of our children, and I urge my colleagues to join me by supporting this legislation and vote yes on final passage.
First of all, the church cannot be a fiscal agent. They cannot, in our legislation, be a fiscal agent.





